What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
nytimes.com
What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
1–10 of 215 posts
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#2A lot of people dismiss accusations against government agencies or fail to consider hypothetical legal abuse scenarios because "the government would never do that". Yes, the government would ever do that.
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#3Let this serve as a demonstration that government agencies actually can be comically evil. A lot of people dismiss accusations against government agencies or fail to consider hypothetical legal abuse scenarios because "the government would never do that". Yes, the government would ever do that.
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#4Let this serve as a demonstration that government agencies actually can be comically evil. A lot of people dismiss accusations against government agencies or fail to consider hypothetical legal abuse scenarios because "the government would never do that". Yes, the government would ever do that.
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#5Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#6Let this serve as a demonstration that government agencies actually can be comically evil. A lot of people dismiss accusations against government agencies or fail to consider hypothetical legal abuse scenarios because "the government would never do that". Yes, the government would ever do that.
It's stronger than the government would do that. It's that the government did that. This incident of the government trashing one of the world's great civil rights heroes is a mark of shame that all of us Americans have to bear.
Civil Rights Movement -> Destabilizing Effect on American Culture -> Probably a Communist Plot -> Civil Rights Movement is the Enemy
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#7Tbh, this is what scares me about tech illiterate juries. Many of these cases hang on key pieces of evidence that are literally the FBI's word against the defendants.
We need some sort of standardised trust metric....
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#8http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/magazine/what-an-uncensore...
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#9Tbh, this is what scares me about tech illiterate juries. Many of these cases hang on key pieces of evidence that are literally the FBI's word against the defendants.
Good thing these things come up to make the FBI's word worth less, then! We need some sort of standardised trust metric....
Witness testimony is perfectly fine as long as it isn't implied to be anything greater than that.
Re: What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals
#10San Francisco seems like a broad term but there's so much interesting stuff, they were watching school teachers in the 60s and 70s and trying to create distrust within communities that were too left leaning.