Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
1–10 of 296 posts
Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#2"Of course one means of mitigating this particular attack vector is simply to disable any CGI functionality that makes calls to a shell"
If you're on Ubuntu:
a2dismod cgi
service apache2 restart
If you're NOT running any CGI scripts this will disable CGI support in Apache. Not sure if that takes care of things 100%, but might be helpful.Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#3Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#4Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#5So trying to understand the issue here, is this actually a bash thing or a problem with the web server forwarding commands to bash? I don't understand why bash would be listening to network traffic on its own.
Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#6So trying to understand the issue here, is this actually a bash thing or a problem with the web server forwarding commands to bash? I don't understand why bash would be listening to network traffic on its own.
Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#7Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#8So trying to understand the issue here, is this actually a bash thing or a problem with the web server forwarding commands to bash? I don't understand why bash would be listening to network traffic on its own.
Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#9(Searching for '=>' doesn't show anything, which I would expect it to if -7169 was mentioned.)
Re: Everything you need to know about the Shellshock Bash bug
#10From the article: "Of course one means of mitigating this particular attack vector is simply to disable any CGI functionality that makes calls to a shell" If you're on Ubuntu: a2dismod cgi service apache2 restart If you're NOT running any CGI scripts this will disable CGI support in Apache. Not sure if that takes care of things 100%, but might be helpful.