Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Cuts Struggling Phone’s Price to 99 Cents

nytimes.com

1–10 of 51 posts

Re: Amazon Cuts Struggling Phone’s Price to 99 Cents

#5

How does news from three days ago get up-voted to the front page?

dang has commented on this recently and suggested there are new algorithms to boost "repeat" articles that didn't get traction the first time. the intent is to make sure quality articles get to the front page, even if they're ignored the first time. or something like that.

Re: Amazon Cuts Struggling Phone’s Price to 99 Cents

#7
post #3

How does news from three days ago get up-voted to the front page?

with the arrows at the side

I've been scanning my monitor and sending the articles via mail to my friends and family in order for it to gain traction. I think I'll try your way from now on!

Re: Amazon Cuts Struggling Phone’s Price to 99 Cents

#8
It's interesting how the dynamics work these days, and how Amazon just doesn't seem to be getting it. People are perfectly happy to sign a 2-year contract on a well-designed fully-rounded functional phone, they do that by the tens of millions. They even pay $200 to get the phone. The phone has become personal, and also a necessity as you go through the day. Going through 2 years on a badly designed phone just because somebody gave it to you for free doesn't really makes sense anymore.

Re: Amazon Cuts Struggling Phone’s Price to 99 Cents

#10
post #5

How does news from three days ago get up-voted to the front page?

dang has commented on this recently and suggested there are new algorithms to boost "repeat" articles that didn't get traction the first time. the intent is to make sure quality articles get to the front page, even if they're ignored the first time. or something like that.

An article with a blatantly false headline oughtn't be the target of such boosting algorithms...
Post reply on HN