Before you start learning Lisp...
abhishek.geek.nz
Before you start learning Lisp...
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#2I been trying to learn elisp but I didn't have good enough excuses to write anything in elisp.
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#3> This is because the Lisp standard tries to specify a portable language, not a library.
> Note that even the C language doesn't include these things.
That's true, but the POSIX standard library functions are packaged with almost any C environment except for embedded systems and is usually available 'out of the box'.
Of course there is a clear distinction between what is part of the language and what is part of the library.
Is there an equivalent to so say 'stdlib' in the LISP world ?
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#4Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#5Does anybody have a good elsip project idea? I been trying to learn elisp but I didn't have good enough excuses to write anything in elisp.
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#6why does it say LISP isn't a functional programming language but Clojure is? Isn't Clojure a dialect of Lisp?
So it seems Clojure (and Scheme, Arc, etc) are implicitly excluded by the author.
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#7why does it say LISP isn't a functional programming language but Clojure is? Isn't Clojure a dialect of Lisp?
Generally, lisps are not necessarily functional, though some dialects are, to varying degrees. Common Lisp isn't very functional at all; Scheme is much more functional; and Clojure is quite strongly functional.
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#8why does it say LISP isn't a functional programming language but Clojure is? Isn't Clojure a dialect of Lisp?
Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#9Re: Before you start learning Lisp...
#10why does it say LISP isn't a functional programming language but Clojure is? Isn't Clojure a dialect of Lisp?