Live data from Hacker News

A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

blog.jaredsinclair.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#2
I'm sure that Unread is a great app, but the author seems a little blind to the fact that being featured in the App Store and being written about by prominent bloggers only serve to introduce the product to an audience, not convince them to buy.

I just went to the App Store and looked at the screenshots for the app. There's a surprising lack of functionality depicted in the screenshots. There's nothing about how feeds are presented, or how individual items in a feed are presented. Instead we get "full screen reading", "swipe anywhere to go back", "multiple themes", "rich sharing via OvershareKit" (whatever that is), and a testimonial from someone I've never heard of, who turns out to be the author himself. Oh, and the screenshots themselves are shrunk down to make room for the text annotation at the top. Nothing here makes me feel like I know what I'll be getting for my $4.99:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/unread-an-rss-reader/id75414...

In contrast, my iPhone RSS reader of choice, Reeder 2, has screenshots that show exactly what you'll see on various screens in the app. It's much less of a risk to buy upfront when you know what you'll be getting:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/reeder-2/id697846300?mt=8

Of course, it's easy to armchair criticize, but as someone who is in the target market for an app like this (I've bought and use several well-designed iPhone RSS apps), I thought I'd explain why Unread never managed to convince me it was worth buying.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#4
post #2

I'm sure that Unread is a great app, but the author seems a little blind to the fact that being featured in the App Store and being written about by prominent bloggers only serve to introduce the product to an audience, not convince them to buy. I just went to the App Store and looked at the screenshots for the app. There's a surprising lack of functionality depicted in the screenshots. There's nothing about how feed…

I think the author's point is that it doesn't matter if he convinced you that the app itself was worthwhile; paid app development is not a tenable model for a solo developer. App prices are too low, competition is too high, and getting the word out to customers is difficult and expensive.

Let's say he was simply much better at convincing people and had twice as many people purchase the app as he did. He still would only have made $50,000 from a year of working 60 hour days; and the majority of that revenue came in the days after release while it was still "new" and receiving lots of free press attention (and is not likely to repeat itself in the absence of a marketing campaign).

Keep in mind he now has to support the people who purchased his app while delivering improvements to a new version. Since you likely converted a large chunk of the people who would be interested in your app during your launch free publicity phase, there's a smaller pool of potential customers out there. You can either spend money on building features for users who will never pay you again, or you can spend money on marketing.

Moral of the story here is that the success of a product usually has very little to do with the merits of the product itself and much more to do with marketing. Marketing isn't something you can DIY; it costs money and if you're selling a niche $5 app, you're probably not going to see much return from a marketing campaign either. Without significant marketing or winning the viral popularity lottery, you're probably not even going to make minimum wage off the time you put into your app. The author is just opening his books so other people know what they're getting into.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#5
One thing I wasn't completely sure about reading this was whether there was a service behind the app as well (other than the RSS feeds provided by multiple sites not by the author). I'll just note that anything he says here is undoubtedly even worse for apps that are buy-once but which have servers behind the scenes.

I'm sure that's another reason for the recent uptick in in-app purchases (beyond the profitability of in-game swag). I suspect that serving that market is also what's going to really drive (eventual) uptake of the Dropbox Datastore API assuming that data stored there is charged against the user's account(s) instead of that of the developer. Anything that may let you offload the costs of running a backend server - particularly onto a service that the end-user already uses and perhaps already pays for - is going to have a huge impact on your bottom line long-term.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#6
Really interesting read. Reminds me of also daytrading performance where the allure of profits draw people in until they realize that even on the small chance they make money, short term capital gains tax, brokerage commission and slippage kills you on the order of 35-40%.

But I still think it's worth for the guy to have pursued his dream. Not everyone makes it to major leagues, but it means a lot to the guys themselves who made it to AA. You are a lot better than the working stiffs who are.just sitting in the stands sir.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#7
post #2

I'm sure that Unread is a great app, but the author seems a little blind to the fact that being featured in the App Store and being written about by prominent bloggers only serve to introduce the product to an audience, not convince them to buy. I just went to the App Store and looked at the screenshots for the app. There's a surprising lack of functionality depicted in the screenshots. There's nothing about how feed…

I agree with you 100% about the screenshots. Two weeks ago I was actively looking for a new RSS reader on iOS - I did look at Unread, but the screenshots totally turned me off - they just didn't show what the app experience would be like and I wasn't sure what to expect. I ended up buying Reeder 2.

I think if Jared updated the screenshots to be full view, real screenshots, showcasing a flow of functionality, he'd significantly increase his conversion rate. Same with the website - more / better screenshots and he probably would have had my business.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#8

One thing I wasn't completely sure about reading this was whether there was a service behind the app as well (other than the RSS feeds provided by multiple sites not by the author). I'll just note that anything he says here is undoubtedly even worse for apps that are buy-once but which have servers behind the scenes. I'm sure that's another reason for the recent uptick in in-app purchases (beyond the profitability of…

I think that's also the thinking behind Apple having CloudKit in iOS 8: as I understand, it's a set amount of space/processing per user.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#9
post #2

I'm sure that Unread is a great app, but the author seems a little blind to the fact that being featured in the App Store and being written about by prominent bloggers only serve to introduce the product to an audience, not convince them to buy. I just went to the App Store and looked at the screenshots for the app. There's a surprising lack of functionality depicted in the screenshots. There's nothing about how feed…

I find this comment fascinating.

Unread's greatness isn't like that of Microsoft Word. Microsoft Word has a thousand features, and they're all there to see on a screenshot. Tab dialogs with thirty tabs, windows with dozens of buttons, and so on and so forth.

Which may or may not be good, but it definitely is neither small nor modest. Microsoft Word is great, like Ghengis Khan's army was great, and affords impressive, even overwhelming photos.

Not so Unread. Its qualities not not easy to photograph.

Perhaps minimalistic UIs that emphasize DWIM and comfort are unsaleable in an App Store that gives prominence to screenshots.

Re: A Candid Look at Unread’s First Year

#10
>... developer[s] should seriously consider only building apps based on sustainable revenue models.

You don't need an MBA to know this. His app is competing with some pretty good free apps like Feedly. His screenshots don't sell the app. It's not really a big market. In-app purchase allows a "try before you buy" model. Was there any sustained marketing? Did he appeal to a niche? Maybe he would sell RSS subscription packs for specific areas: lawyers, programmers, biotech, investors, etc.

Post reply on HN