Responsive Logos

#1

Post by hxw » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 8:37 AM UTC

Re: Responsive Logos

#2

Post by cateye » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:28 AM UTC

I am not a supporter of omitting information because there is less space. I'd rather choose restructuring of the information.

(I guess there is a reason in the first place to display the information. Simply leaving it out feels very wrong. Or it was already unnecessary.)

Re: Responsive Logos

#3

Post by arketyp » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:28 AM UTC

Never seen "Coke" in that classic font before. Is it new or perhaps particular to the US?

Re: Responsive Logos

#4

Post by hxw » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:33 AM UTC

arketyp wrote: post #3

Never seen "Coke" in that classic font before. Is it new or perhaps particular to the US?

I've never seen it before, so I do not think that has been ever used officially.

Re: Responsive Logos

#5

Post by hxw » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:38 AM UTC

cateye wrote: post #2

I am not a supporter of omitting information because there is less space. I'd rather choose restructuring of the information. (I guess there is a reason in the first place to display the information. Simply leaving it out feels very wrong. Or it was already unnecessary.)

I think the whole reason for having a logo mark is to have something is that is immediately recognised, even when the logo type is omitted. You can't/don't always use the full logo, as it isn't always the best visual solution.

Re: Responsive Logos

#6

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:39 AM UTC

hxw wrote: post #4

arketyp wrote: post #3

Never seen "Coke" in that classic font before. Is it new or perhaps particular to the US?

I've never seen it before, so I do not think that has been ever used officially.

[deleted]

Re: Responsive Logos

#7

Post by MatthewWilkes » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:47 AM UTC

[deleted] wrote: post #6

hxw wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never seen it before, so I do not think that has been ever used officially.

[deleted]

It's not on the page you link to and I don't recall ever seeing it in the UK.

Re: Responsive Logos

#8

Post by gleenn » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:55 AM UTC

arketyp wrote: post #3

Never seen "Coke" in that classic font before. Is it new or perhaps particular to the US?

Isn't it on all the cans? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=coke+cola+can

Re: Responsive Logos

#9

Post by denzquix » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:55 AM UTC

MatthewWilkes wrote: post #7

[deleted] wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

It's not on the page you link to and I don't recall ever seeing it in the UK.

My mistake, I misread.

Re: Responsive Logos

#10

Post by userbinator » Tue, Jul 22, 2014, 9:55 AM UTC

Is "responsive" the new buzzword for "things that change when you resize them"? I've been seeing it used an awful lot in web design as of the past few years, often rather vaguely as some sort of feature.