The Death of the Urdu Script
medium.com
The Death of the Urdu Script
1–10 of 141 posts
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#2It doesn't look like it'll get out of the new queue, but I wanted to thank OP for sharing it anyway.
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#3--
"It has been made officially clear to me that [my] Blog ... is for all intents and purposes dead."
Well, I blogged about a patent and included art, so my former manager took the Blog down with extreme prejudice.
--
Blog is now archived at http://www.siao2.com/ and has much more information on localisation.
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#4Unsurprising to see a link to Michael Kaplan in there. His blog was taken down due to what sounds like a dispute over patents with his boss. See this twitter conversation between Spolsky and him: https://twitter.com/spolsky/status/447024470256283648 . -- "It has been made officially clear to me that [my] Blog ... is for all intents and purposes dead ." Well, I blogged about a patent and included art, so my former man…
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#5Ali Eteraz
ps - I later got to meet Michael K. at the Unicode conference in Santa Clara, along with the Microsoft Windows team. The Windows Phone people, who I also really wanted to talk to because this is a mobile problem too, did not want to talk to me because they had a new phone coming out.
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#6Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#7I have written about some other issues with the Urdu language over here. http://upgoerurdu.nfshost.com/technical.html
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#8Is that supposed to be self-evidently bad?
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#9https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ySTZaXP5XKFg0OpmHZM0...
https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/blob/master/test/shaping/...
(Harfbuzz is the default text layout engine for Linux GUI frameworks: Qt, GTK, etc)
Re: The Death of the Urdu Script
#10For web development, perhaps you could create a simple system that detects if the user's device supports nastaliq. If not convert, it to naskh or Romanized Urdu (not sure which is preferred). As for dealing with all the data already written in naskh and Romanized Urdu, this is a bit more complicated because I am guessing there is not a one to one match between naskh and nastaliq (naskh has less letters), and Romanize…
(I don't think Roman Urdu is ever used for anything serious.)