Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
codegangsta.io
Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#2I've used Martini a bit and also tried some of the other frameworks (beego and revel) and I really don't see what makes people call Martini especially non-Gooey in comparison.
The reality is, when your language is as weak as Go (in terms of advanced features), a framework with any sort of significant features will be quite dynamic and "magic".
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#3Sounds great. In a broader context, I don't know why people pick on Go (aside from it being an 'evil Google creation') -- especially when many of Go's critics are _also_ people who claim to support simplicity and consistency in programming languages. I have a good feeling Go will become dominant in the no-so-distant future, so rather than knock it, why not help grow it / make it better?
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#4For me, stdlib + some mux library is still the way to go until someday I see the shortcomings.
But this is a very classy and admirable way to answer all the critics. He didn't take them offensively at all. Instead he puts more thoughts on the design objectively and sincerely, and come up with what might be a better architecture in the end.
Hats off to codegangsta and good luck on Negroni.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#5Just in case... How to make a Negroni with Anthony Bourdain.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#6Awesome response to criticism. Also, love the direction this takes.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#7Martini's "Hello world" is averaging about 60-90 microseconds on my machine. Negroni clocks in at 30-50.
I think both libraries have their advantages.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#8Not mentioned in the blog post but he also tagged Martini at v1.0 today [1], making its API locked in, if anyone is so inclined to keep using it.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#9I just love Campari.
Re: Thoughts on Martini – Introducing Negroni
#10I've used Martini a bit and also tried some of the other frameworks (beego and revel) and I really don't see what makes people call Martini especially non-Gooey in comparison. The reality is, when your language is as weak as Go (in terms of advanced features), a framework with any sort of significant features will be quite dynamic and "magic".
Except that's obviously not the case, considering he just announced Negroni, an idiomatic ("non-magical") library that provides the key feature of Martini.