Announcing .NET Native Preview
blogs.msdn.com
Announcing .NET Native Preview
1–10 of 85 posts
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#2Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#3I'm kind of scratching my head here, can someone explain what problem this solves? There's already a CLR and already a way to build native apps for Win 8, etc. This is a new CLR that can run new 'native' apps?
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#4I'm kind of scratching my head here, can someone explain what problem this solves? There's already a CLR and already a way to build native apps for Win 8, etc. This is a new CLR that can run new 'native' apps?
CLR apps require just in time compiling which can take a little time to first run. So this should speed up opening the apps.
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#5I'm kind of scratching my head here, can someone explain what problem this solves? There's already a CLR and already a way to build native apps for Win 8, etc. This is a new CLR that can run new 'native' apps?
CLR apps require just in time compiling which can take a little time to first run. So this should speed up opening the apps.
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#6Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
CLR apps require just in time compiling which can take a little time to first run. So this should speed up opening the apps.
Sure, but ngen solved that problem years ago: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/6t9t5wcf(v=vs.110).a...
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#8Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#9I'm kind of scratching my head here, can someone explain what problem this solves? There's already a CLR and already a way to build native apps for Win 8, etc. This is a new CLR that can run new 'native' apps?
I suspect that there's things that require this which they haven't announced yet, since on its own it seems like something kinda nice but not beneficial enough to justify creating.
Re: Announcing .NET Native Preview
#10Do native apps still require a preinstalled CLR?