Inclusiveness at Mozilla
brendaneich.com
Inclusiveness at Mozilla
1–10 of 196 posts
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#2For those of you who are as confused as I was about why he's being so defensive about LGBT issues, here's context:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/03/gay-firefox-develope...
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#3i'm really not one of those baying for his head, but didn't that just kind of read like 'but some of my best friends are black!'?
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#4Nothing in the post indicates he's reversed his stance on prohibiting his gay employees from marrying.
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#5i'm really not one of those baying for his head, but didn't that just kind of read like 'but some of my best friends are black!'?
No, it didn't read like that at all.
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#6[deleted]
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#7Nothing in the post indicates he's reversed his stance on prohibiting his gay employees from marrying.
Luckily he doesn't have authority over that as their CEO. He addressed the things he does have authority over.
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#8Expressing sorrow for causing hurt isn't the same as taking responsibility for it.
The very first action should be an apology, but that hasn't happened and doesn't look like it'll ever happen.
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#9Nothing in the post indicates he's reversed his stance on prohibiting his gay employees from marrying.
Would you believe him even if he did? If this whole event caused him to change his stance on gay marriage, it would probably be the wrong event to do so. If Brendan decides to support gay marriage it should happen because his values have changed, not because people are mad that he is a CEO who doesn't support gay marriage.
Re: Inclusiveness at Mozilla
#10Nothing in the post indicates he's reversed his stance on prohibiting his gay employees from marrying.
Which companies have CEOs that have the power to prevent anyone from marrying?