The Brutal Ageism of Tech
newrepublic.com
The Brutal Ageism of Tech
1–10 of 361 posts
Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#2Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#3Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#4Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#5I don't really get the pragmatism behind ageism in tech entrepreneurship. That is, in a field in which human abilities are augmented by ever-more faster computing, and in which ideas, experience, and relationships would seemingly be as important (if not much more ) as youthful energy...how is it logical that its best people would solely be among sub-30-year olds? It just doesn't make any sense.
Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#6It's also a natural progression of an engineer to start off as an employee & then take an independent identity. So it's common to see older engineers become consultants & business owners; who then hire the younger, cheaper, more impressionable employees.
Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#7Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#8Outside the valley you find a plenty of really competent programmers mostly in there late 40's along with a few people that are nearing retirement age and while often gruff tend to blow your minds. As in "we stopped testing his code years ago." Or just calling someone team _. As in you could get 15-30 people working on a project or if your lucky Bob.
Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#9Re: The Brutal Ageism of Tech
#10Guess what, there's a lot of software being written by people not in their 20s in places like Kansas City, Boston and Nashville. The world doesn't revolve around Silicon Valley.
Edit: I know not all of Silicon Valley is doing pointless startups.