The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
1–10 of 246 posts
Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#2Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#3Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#4I wish poor internet connection was something I could really get upset about, but I guess the rest of my life is a lot better than most around the world.
Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#5That seems like the most egregious thing in the article: treating Internet-based video delivery as a cable company. The concept of local cable franchise monopolies is ridiculous enough to begin with, and the only possible justification hinges on not wanting to have multiple sets of cables wired everywhere. Content delivered over the Internet completely eliminates that justification, leaving no possible rationale for making such services subject to franchise regulations.
Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#6Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#7Internet cost as part of income is more accurate
Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#8http://www.theconnectivist.com/2013/11/the-worlds-cheapest-a... Internet cost as part of income is more accurate
Re: The $200 Billion Rip-Off: Our broadband future was stolen (2007)
#9I'm Australian, am I to understand that our internet quality and distribution is only just approaching what the American's had in 2007? WTF!? I wish poor internet connection was something I could really get upset about, but I guess the rest of my life is a lot better than most around the world.
You don't want to live there, trust me.