SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
sqlalchemy.org
SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#2Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#3Why is SQLAlchemy still under 1.0? Are there good reasons, or is it just the apparently typical (and typically irrational) fear of the version number "1.0"?
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#4now, fantods aside, is there anything like this for java? according to the aosa writeup, sqlalchemy's author found python's multiple inheritance useful for implementing certain ideas, so porting probably isn't straightforward. also, the relevant stackoverflow question ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10537766/closest-equivale... ) seems inconclusive.
this is not to criticize java as a language, but rather because i really wish there was something like sqlalchemy for java.
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#5i'd like to take a moment and thank to @zzeeek [1][2] and all of the contributors.
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#6a really solid, perhaps unique, library that, as far as i can tell, completely addresses the "impedence mismatch" argument. if you're directly using a database api in a structured way, you've probably already reimplemented the sqlalchemy core, and refactoring your program to use sqlalchemy will give you an orm, should you want one, and make your code portable across database implementations even if you don't. if you'…
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#7a really solid, perhaps unique, library that, as far as i can tell, completely addresses the "impedence mismatch" argument. if you're directly using a database api in a structured way, you've probably already reimplemented the sqlalchemy core, and refactoring your program to use sqlalchemy will give you an orm, should you want one, and make your code portable across database implementations even if you don't. if you'…
Ebean[1], perhaps? I've only used it for a project in Play 2.0 that was built on Java (it's built into Play 2.0), but it was far less painful compared to other Java ORM libaries like Hibernate.
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#8This. Finally :) I know I was searching this a few months ago and there was a long due ticket for this to be added. Thank you whoever did this patch.
A side note. I personally use Pyramid (I use Pyramid more, however) and Flask. For Flask project I never use flask-sqlalchemy because mitsuhiko doesn't seem to update the repository as often as he should. A lot of outstanding tickets and pull requests. Some are merged but they are never closed. So I always end up bringing up SQLAlchemy myself into Flask because I just don't trust the library. Is that how people feel too? For Pyramid, SQLAclemy is the "standard" ORM to use and with ini file it is supposed easy to integrate SA into Pyramid app.
Re: SQLAlchemy 0.9.0 Released
#9Why is SQLAlchemy still under 1.0? Are there good reasons, or is it just the apparently typical (and typically irrational) fear of the version number "1.0"?