Investing Time vs. Spending Time
tynan.com
Investing Time vs. Spending Time
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#2Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#3Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#4Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#5Investing time understanding users or improving your tools makes a big difference in the long term. When you understand your users you can work on the right features. When you sharpen your tools you spend less time wasting time with repeat tasks. For example, how long it takes to release a new version of your product matters a lot. Automated testing for most common problems makes you move faster.
In general, the best way to invest your time is to automate repetitive tasks.
Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#6Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#7Return on time, (ROT?), is always something other than time and thus measures of it are highly subjective. In the end, what you are spending is your life and although there might be preferable ways of doing it, I'd imagine that being the achievers they are, HN members usually err on the side of investing it. Actually PG's essay offers a nice exposition of spending time (having fun) vs investing it vs fake work:
Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#8I'm having hard time wrapping my head around the time-money analogy here. In the case of money, by investing it or delaying spending, you can have more of it in future. In the case of time this does not hold, because time is essentially a shrinking resource. You can't have more time in future by delaying spending or 'investing' it in the manner OP suggests. Return on time, (ROT?), is always something other than time…
Unless you are doing something to prolong your life (eating healthy, working on an anti-aging cure etc). I don't think the analogy is that bad.
Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#9Re: Investing Time vs. Spending Time
#10I'm having hard time wrapping my head around the time-money analogy here. In the case of money, by investing it or delaying spending, you can have more of it in future. In the case of time this does not hold, because time is essentially a shrinking resource. You can't have more time in future by delaying spending or 'investing' it in the manner OP suggests. Return on time, (ROT?), is always something other than time…
And that's leaving aside entirely the idea that time == money (ie. you can often substitute one for the other, or invest one to later gain the other).