Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#2This article is just another in a long line of "I heard Vista sucks (but never tried it) and 7 is good (but never tried it)" articles.
It's a cliché argument with a predictable conclusion. There's not a single interesting, unique, or insightful thought in this article.
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#3http://www.itwriting.com/blog/1552-windows-7-cheap-prices-bu...
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#4Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#5Fire glints his glasses. Anger sparked heat burns a hole in his pumped fist. He squeezes and breathes fire: "You'll pay for our mistakes."
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#6Vista is a good operating system. Much better than XP. Windows 7 is better than both. This article is just another in a long line of "I heard Vista sucks (but never tried it) and 7 is good (but never tried it)" articles. It's a cliché argument with a predictable conclusion. There's not a single interesting, unique, or insightful thought in this article.
These people who think Vista was a great step forward seem to only exist on the internet and nowhere else.
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#7Vista is a good operating system. Much better than XP. Windows 7 is better than both. This article is just another in a long line of "I heard Vista sucks (but never tried it) and 7 is good (but never tried it)" articles. It's a cliché argument with a predictable conclusion. There's not a single interesting, unique, or insightful thought in this article.
Why is it that the entire internet is covered with opinions mirroring this, dismissing everyone who doesn't like Vista as "having not tried it", but whenever I actually ask people in real life, the universal conclusion of everyone who has tried it is that it was terrible? These people who think Vista was a great step forward seem to only exist on the internet and nowhere else.
Is this a metaphysics question? I exist outside of the internet.
> dismissing everyone who doesn't like Vista
I wasn't dismissing every argument against Vista. Just this guy's.
There are several valid arguments against Vista. Namely, it has heftier memory requirements (at least 2 gigs) and needs a decent video card ($150+). These are real concerns, and problems XP didn't have.
However, this guy made the blanket statement "Vista bad, 7 good". There's no subtlety or analysis.
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#8Nowadays, with netbooks around $250 it is not such a good idea.
Much worse during a recession.
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#9Vista is a good operating system. Much better than XP. Windows 7 is better than both. This article is just another in a long line of "I heard Vista sucks (but never tried it) and 7 is good (but never tried it)" articles. It's a cliché argument with a predictable conclusion. There's not a single interesting, unique, or insightful thought in this article.
Why is it that the entire internet is covered with opinions mirroring this, dismissing everyone who doesn't like Vista as "having not tried it", but whenever I actually ask people in real life, the universal conclusion of everyone who has tried it is that it was terrible? These people who think Vista was a great step forward seem to only exist on the internet and nowhere else.
Re: Microsoft to Vista Owners: You'll Pay for Our Mistake
#10Years ago, when computers were $1000 or more, it seemed plausible to charge $200 for an OS. Nowadays, with netbooks around $250 it is not such a good idea. Much worse during a recession.