Obamacare’s web site is really bad
washingtonpost.com
Obamacare’s web site is really bad
1–10 of 65 posts
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#2Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#3Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#4I see it as any big new service out there. In the beginning there is going to be a spike in user interest. I'm guessing a large number of people using the site right now are doing it just out of interest (due to news reports about it). People browsing the site may have no intentions of actually paying for healthcare through the system, they just want to poke around and see what it has to offer.
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#5[deleted]
EDIT: Parent post had posited that the government couldn't just spool up AWS servers like the rest of us, so I provided that link just because they technically could (not saying that it would have been a good choice for something of this scale or purpose)
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#6[deleted]
http://aws.amazon.com/federal/ EDIT: Parent post had posited that the government couldn't just spool up AWS servers like the rest of us, so I provided that link just because they technically could (not saying that it would have been a good choice for something of this scale or purpose)
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#7Medicare was successfully delivering care decades before the web was even invented and we all somehow survived.
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#8> The good news for Obamacare is that lots of people want to sign up. Lots and lots of people. Many more, in fact, than anyone expected. The bad news is that the Obama administration's online insurance marketplace -- which serves 34 states -- can't handle the success. I see it as any big new service out there. In the beginning there is going to be a spike in user interest. I'm guessing a large number of people using…
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
http://aws.amazon.com/federal/ EDIT: Parent post had posited that the government couldn't just spool up AWS servers like the rest of us, so I provided that link just because they technically could (not saying that it would have been a good choice for something of this scale or purpose)
[deleted]
Re: Obamacare’s web site is really bad
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
http://aws.amazon.com/federal/ EDIT: Parent post had posited that the government couldn't just spool up AWS servers like the rest of us, so I provided that link just because they technically could (not saying that it would have been a good choice for something of this scale or purpose)
[deleted]