Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#2Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#3This is one patent I really hope gets used in litigation.
This is why mobile is too important to be in the control of a single proprietary vendor.
Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#4Is this not old news though? The first time I was really relieved I use CyanogenMod in particular was when the story broke the an American company was actively encouraging carriers to use a special monitoring system that cooperated with the necessary phone-side code baked into the firmware. This caused shock waves, ironically dwarfed by PRISMgasm. I believe it was CarrierIQ. The current revelations blew the scope out of the water; it took me a while to even re-jog my memory using Google.
Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#5He also mentions there are legitimate but less headline-worthy uses for this:
> While the patent does use "covert police or government operations" as an example of an application, it also mentions legitimate applications, for example, stopping cameras in a locker room or other place where one has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#6Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#7Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#8The source of the boing boing post: http://cis471.blogspot.com/2013/08/apple-patents-wireless-ca... He also mentions there are legitimate but less headline-worthy uses for this: > While the patent does use "covert police or government operations" as an example of an application, it also mentions legitimate applications, for example, stopping cameras in a locker room or other place where one has a reasonable expectati…
There have been important photos taken in locker rooms.
There is a reasonable expectation of privacy at times, but it is enforced by social pressure, not a technology backdoor.
If someone really wants to take surreptitious locker room photos, they can, and do, find ways around tech like this. The inverse is also true. If someone has a legitimate reason to take a photo in a verboten place (locker room or protest) it's much more likely they will be stopped by this.
Re: Apple patents tech that lets government disable iPhone video, camera and wi-fi
#9The source of the boing boing post: http://cis471.blogspot.com/2013/08/apple-patents-wireless-ca... He also mentions there are legitimate but less headline-worthy uses for this: > While the patent does use "covert police or government operations" as an example of an application, it also mentions legitimate applications, for example, stopping cameras in a locker room or other place where one has a reasonable expectati…