Live data from Hacker News

Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 28 posts

Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#1
Has it ever happened to you that you sent an email, and right after, you wanted it back?

It occurred to me more than once. Either that I found some spelling errors, or just feeling like rephrasing a paragraph, or whatever.

The question is why not let the sender pull back a message in case the recipient had never read it.

Even if it would be hard to modify the SMTP and POP protocols it can be still done with in the same server/domain, e.g. gmail.com.

I think this feature is a good one. What do you think?

Re: Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#2
I think there must be some mental process associated with the 'sent' or 'submit' button. It's as though the brain gets new information once those buttons are pressed that was previously unavailable prior to those buttons being pressed. Maybe it's called hindsight, or some type of reflective process.

Does the unconscious mind adopt 'regret' only at specific times, that is, after making a choice?

As an idea to improve emailing, maybe an email client that renames the send button draft 1 then draft 2 then draft 3 before ever showing 'send'. Also, there would be a time delay buffer to stop one's overriding of that 'delayed sending' feature through pressing the button 3 times rapidly in succession. The idea could even be implemented as a Thunderbird addon if one was serious about it, or a greasemonkey script.

Also, I like Digg's submission process of giving 90 seconds to change a posting before it is made permanent, that is, after pressing the 'post' button - it kind of adds a type of pressure which some people need to improve their output given the feature allows textual changes to be made in that time.

Ultimately, the need to proof read and reflect on any written communication multiple times without others' feedback can be a test of one's patience and tenacity. Regret only happens after commitment, so who can ever be certain about a choice...

Re: Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#3
Most mail clients can be configured not to send messages immediately, but to hold them in the Outbox until you hit the main Send/Receive button.

Also, I believe Lotus Notes had the feature that enabled you to take a message back (it literally removed the unread message from the recipient's Inbox).

Re: Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#5
Even if it would be hard to modify the SMTP and POP protocols it can be still done with in the same server/domain, e.g. gmail.com.

Unless you can make it universal, i.e. across all domains, it's unlikely to catch on.

Microsoft had (still has?) a similar feature in Outlook, but it was dependent on the recipient also using Outlook on the same network (or something like that) and few people used it.

FWIW, I'll never forget the advice I got about email from a mentor at an i-bank where I used to work: don't write anything in an email that you'd be embarrassed to see show up in the Wall Street Journal.

Re: Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#6
Yes! All it would take is a slight delay (1-5 minutes, even better if the user could set it) after sending the email before it's actually sent. Too many times I've forgotten to attach a file or something else stupid like that and realized it immediately after hitting send.

Re: Ever wanted to withdraw an email you just sent?

#9
Well, you could just discipline yourself to save outgoing emails in your `drafts` folder for a bit and read them again before you actually send them. That's what I do for most emails and it works pretty well for me.

I really wouldn't want my email service to delay my emails when I actually click `send` - I sometimes rely on them being sent immediately.

Post reply on HN