'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
1–10 of 71 posts
Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#2Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#3Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#4Requires registration to download the paper... Mirror: http://tehlug.org/files/solove.pdf
EDIT: On clicking "download" a second time, I do get a login page -- but it still has a "download anonymously" option, says you just won't count towards the paper's stats.
Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#5Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#6Requires registration to download the paper... Mirror: http://tehlug.org/files/solove.pdf
I just clicked the OP link, then clicked "Download this paper" and I had it. I have no account and have never visited SSRN before... EDIT: On clicking "download" a second time, I do get a login page -- but it still has a "download anonymously" option, says you just won't count towards the paper's stats.
Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#7Re: 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [pdf]
#8Strongly recommended by the libertarian law professor Glenn Reynolds, best known as the Instapundit link blogger, http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/170554/ : " It’s the #1 paper on SSRN for all-time downloads, and with good reason. "
"With the proliferation of services available for faculty to share their
scholarship online, “download” or “view” counts have also become a domi-
nant marker of “impact,” particular ly download counts from subject
and institutional repositories. (Some full-text research databases and
other com- mercial services have begun to refl ect usage statistics in
their products. This type of metric differs significantly from citation
metrics: it is really a measurement of the “popularity” or visi bility
of the article, noting whether an abstract was viewed or visited and
whether a link was clicked rather than whether the paper was actually
read, thought well of, and used.
...
The top downloaded paper of all time on SSRN as of the writing of this
Article appears on none of Shapiro’s lists. 81 Furthermore, only one
paper on Shapiro’s all-time top 100 list in Table I or recent-articles
list in Table II appears in SSRN’s top 100 downloaded papers ( Property,
Intellectual Property, and Free Riding by Mark A. Lemley). Of the top
100 downloaded law authors in SSRN, only 15 are on any of Shapiro’s
lists. Looking at the au- thors listed in the recent-articles lis t in
Table II, the author’s most downloaded paper of all time appears in this
list only approximately half the time. It is clear that while arguably a
metric in and of itself, being a top downloaded paper in SSRN does not
equate with being a top-cited paper of all time. One could argue that an
artic le’s presence in newer cited-reference services might potentially
provide a new metric, but as with other metrics, it is subject to the
volatility of the source content."[3]
[1] https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/netwo...[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale-free_network
[3] http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/110/8/Shapiro_a...