Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
attractivechaos.wordpress.com
Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#2Update the Go example to use 1.1 :D
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#3I'm really excited by Rust because it seems to be one of the most sensible language designs I've seen in a while. Go is nice but has some pretty odd syntax in places. I'm just waiting on Rust to hit 1.0 before I start playing with it more seriously.
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#4Update the Go example to use 1.1 :D
Y'know,
That GCC is six years old.[1] Go, Rust, Dart and V8 didn't even exist when it was released. Maybe update that if anything?
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#5I'm really excited by Rust because it seems to be one of the most sensible language designs I've seen in a while. Go is nice but has some pretty odd syntax in places. I'm just waiting on Rust to hit 1.0 before I start playing with it more seriously.
A nice ML influenced system programming language, that even has generics, who would guess that?!
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#6Update the Go example to use 1.1 :D
Y'know, That GCC is six years old.[1] Go, Rust, Dart and V8 didn't even exist when it was released. Maybe update that if anything? [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
And since it's a Mac, it is probably llvm-gcc (GCC with an LLVM backend).
A colleague/friend who is developing neural network software recently switched from gcc 4.2.1 to 4.5 (which is still old) and got a 50% speed increase without touching any code.
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#7Java 1.6 is more than 6 years old now too. I half expected to see a Turbo Pascal 4 benchmark mixed in there before I realized I was joking.
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#8Update the Go example to use 1.1 :D
That's the first thing I thought, too. I'd like to see both Go 1.1 and Go 1.0.3 for a comparison (on this benchmark). I'm hoping that before long we'll be able to count on Go being within a factor of 2 of plain C by most benchmarks.
And I'd like to see CPython 3.3 in addition to PyPy.
But it's quite interesting as is. Thanks.
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#9It would be nice to see a Nimrod benchmark.
Re: Performance of Rust and Dart in Sudoku Solving
#10I've tried it with go tip and go 1.0.
T(go tip) / T(go 1.0.3) = 0.8
Thus one might expect go to take third place after clang and gcc. But keep in mind that e.g. java isn't the newest version either...