The model picker is a dead end
lovable.dev
The model picker is a dead end
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: The model picker is a dead end
#2This article certainly talks a lot about their brand and their approach. Understandable!
Giving up model selection is giving up some level of control and understanding.
I have no doubts over the long haul what is being said here is true, but I'm confident the tooling to perform model selection will be pushed upstream, not downstream. Model vendors have a strong incentive to produce controllable results and will follow their own benchmarks.
The entire "self-improving" concept is reliant on getting better at getting to a solid result with the right efforts and subagents.
Re: The model picker is a dead end
#3This article certainly talks a lot about their brand and their approach. Understandable! Giving up model selection is giving up some level of control and understanding. I have no doubts over the long haul what is being said here is true, but I'm confident the tooling to perform model selection will be pushed upstream, not downstream. Model vendors have a strong incentive to produce controllable results and will follo…
[deleted]
Re: The model picker is a dead end
#4I don’t get how this differs from any other optimization harness. The problem is clear, but I’m not sure on what this company is doing that is unique to solve it.
Re: The model picker is a dead end
#5More AI written bloat. why should I bother reading it if you can't bother making it readable? It's like reading a student's essay who had a page of information and is stretching it to fill 5 pages.
Re: The model picker is a dead end
#6More AI written bloat. why should I bother reading it if you can't bother making it readable? It's like reading a student's essay who had a page of information and is stretching it to fill 5 pages.
> The choice matters.
Yeah this is where I stopped reading.