Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

isgithubcooked.com

Post reply on HN

Print view View original

1–10 of 195 posts

GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#1

Post by toomanyrichies » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 7:43 PM UTC

GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?
isgithubcooked.com

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#2

Post by johnea » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:10 PM UTC

Oh, I thought it said "Github Outrage Tracker".

I was ready to click...

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#3

Post by jakub_g » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:24 PM UTC

Possibly inspired by:

https://red-squares.cian.lol/

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#4

Post by HPsquared » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:26 PM UTC

johnea wrote: post #2

Oh, I thought it said "Github Outrage Tracker". I was ready to click...

That one would be like iscaliforniaonfire.com

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#5

Post by ChrisArchitect » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:38 PM UTC

jakub_g wrote: post #3

Possibly inspired by: https://red-squares.cian.lol/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034587

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#6

Post by arlattimore » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:40 PM UTC

I literally chuckled out loud when I saw the headline :D

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#7

Post by kevmo » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:43 PM UTC

An important thing to consider is how much of their uptime without incidents is not the normal working hours. Their incident-free uptime on 9-5 EST, Mon-Fri, is probably like 60%.

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#8

Post by bushbaba » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:45 PM UTC

could have been a page with a static 'Yes' and a significant portion of time it'd be accurate.

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#9

Post by fenio » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 8:56 PM UTC

https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/

Re: GitHub Outage Tracker: Is GitHub Cooked?

#10

Post by Gander5739 » Wed, Aug 26, 2026, 9:00 PM UTC

bushbaba wrote: post #8

could have been a page with a static 'Yes' and a significant portion of time it'd be accurate.

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2236/

Post reply on HN