My understanding that all AI can, and will hallucinate. I get downvoted for saying this, but no one ever says I'm wrong or cites any source. Perhaps it's more nuanced than that? Please, enlighten me.
Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
1–10 of 62 posts
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#2I have t see t hat I a few years
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#3I think its solved, with the right setup and model. I couldn't tell u the last time my agent hallucinated. For me I consider it solved. However some dude feeding massive docs into gpt chat and long conversations, It is not solved in this context.
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#4[dead]
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#5I think its solved, with the right setup and model. I couldn't tell u the last time my agent hallucinated. For me I consider it solved. However some dude feeding massive docs into gpt chat and long conversations, It is not solved in this context.
Would you trust it to make life and death decisions? Because it is being used in that context. Drones with AI, armed, and with discretion to choose a target and kill it.
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#6I'm hoping for more than anecdotes. I believe AI is not ready for what it's being used for, but all I get are downvotes and no citations. Maybe all of you are just scared to say it out loud?
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#7My personal opinion: all output from LLMs is hallucinations. The idea that it’s “right” or “wrong”, when stating factual information is really in the eye of the beholder/user. What year did astronauts land on the moon? — is a question that may or may not have a factual answer depending on your own beliefs. Philosophically, you would need to also define what a fact is, or what “not hallucinating” is, to define what a hallucination is. My understanding is that this property of the LLM architecture is innate, and until we have “world model” LLMs, or some other model that reasons from first principles, instead of the current “guess the next word” model, this isn’t going away. Just don’t rely on the for facts.
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#8My personal opinion: all output from LLMs is hallucinations. The idea that it’s “right” or “wrong”, when stating factual information is really in the eye of the beholder/user. What year did astronauts land on the moon? — is a question that may or may not have a factual answer depending on your own beliefs. Philosophically, you would need to also define what a fact is, or what “not hallucinating” is, to define what a…
[deleted]
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#9AI will never be fully reliable, and people never will be. But AI is wrong in much less predictable and stable ways, and with much less accountability.
Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?
#10I think its solved, with the right setup and model. I couldn't tell u the last time my agent hallucinated. For me I consider it solved. However some dude feeding massive docs into gpt chat and long conversations, It is not solved in this context.
Man there really isn’t a criticism that won’t lead to a booster saying you’re holding it wrong