Writing with AI Is Stupid
lambdaland.org
Writing with AI Is Stupid
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Writing with AI Is Stupid
#2I feel the same about AI with art. Even when it looks “as good”, it just doesn’t interest me. For example, intentionality of someone writing a specific sentence, or composing an image a certain way to me is intriguing. If someone makes an arbitrary choice with something like generative fill, it makes me feel like their whole piece is arbitrary. Then why do I care?
Re: Writing with AI Is Stupid
#3I feel the same about AI with art. Even when it looks “as good”, it just doesn’t interest me. For example, intentionality of someone writing a specific sentence, or composing an image a certain way to me is intriguing. If someone makes an arbitrary choice with something like generative fill, it makes me feel like their whole piece is arbitrary. Then why do I care?
You'll like Brandon Sanderson's keynote talk: https://www.brandonsanderson.com/blogs/blog/ai-art-brandon-s...
Quote:
You might say, “Well, if AI gets good enough and the product is the same, what’s the difference?” The difference is that the books aren’t the product. They aren’t the art--not completely. And this is the point. The most important thing to understand is that the process of creating art makes art of you.
My friends, let me repeat that. The book, the painting, the film script is not the only art. It’s important, but in a way it’s a receipt. It’s a diploma. The book you write, the painting you create, the music you compose is important and artistic, but it’s also a mark of proof that you have done the work to learn.
Because in the end of it all, you are the art.
Re: Writing with AI Is Stupid
#4I feel the same about AI with art. Even when it looks “as good”, it just doesn’t interest me. For example, intentionality of someone writing a specific sentence, or composing an image a certain way to me is intriguing. If someone makes an arbitrary choice with something like generative fill, it makes me feel like their whole piece is arbitrary. Then why do I care?
That intentionality is critical in so many ways.
When I'm appreciating art (including the written word) and come across something that makes no sense to me, that intentionality means that I can trust that the reason it seems nonsensical is because I'm missing something, not because it's actually nonsensical. Then I can ponder what it is that I'm missing. A different point of view, a different interpretation, etc., will make the piece click, leading to a moment of enlightenment.
This is perhaps my favorite aspect of art. It's a moment where, maybe just for a fleeting instant, I become aware that I have experienced the world through another person's mind. It's amazing.
But I have to be able to trust there is intentionality there, otherwise why bother actually deeply contemplating the art? Lack of it drains the art of importance. It just turns it into pretty pictures, sounds, words, etc.
Re: Writing with AI Is Stupid
#5I feel the same about AI with art. Even when it looks “as good”, it just doesn’t interest me. For example, intentionality of someone writing a specific sentence, or composing an image a certain way to me is intriguing. If someone makes an arbitrary choice with something like generative fill, it makes me feel like their whole piece is arbitrary. Then why do I care?
You'll like Brandon Sanderson's keynote talk: https://www.brandonsanderson.com/blogs/blog/ai-art-brandon-s... Quote: You might say, “Well, if AI gets good enough and the product is the same, what’s the difference?” The difference is that the books aren’t the product. They aren’t the art--not completely. And this is the point. The most important thing to understand is that the process of creating art makes art of you.…
Sanderson speaks truth.
Literally every artist I have known has, at one time or another, expressed some variant of this sentiment to me: the art is the process more than the result.