Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#2Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#3 #define MICROPY_HW_ENABLE_RNG (0)
[...]
#ifndef MICROPY_HW_ENABLE_RNG
#error "get a HW TRNG plz"
#endifRe: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#4Enticed by riches, hackers worldwide are now going through all firmware source code , wit the help of the latest AI models, for all wallets to find misconfigurations and other problems. Expect more thefts from low entropy bugs. AI has clearly been shown to be more more adept at auditing code than humans.
Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#5Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#6"This is hugely damaging to the people who believe that 8 billion people will hold their Bitcoin in cold storage in the future," Lawrence said. "That dream is over. Done."
Sky is falling stuff. Actual cryptography experts have shown the importance (and difficulty) of random number generation for ages. Yes, if your "hardware wallet" aka computer and software is implemented poorly you will have issues.
Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#7Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#8so there was $70 million just sitting there for five years in the open that anyone could have taken. Nuts. Enticed by riches, hackers worldwide are now going through all firmware source code , wit the help of the latest AI models, for all wallets to find misconfigurations and other problems. Expect more thefts from low entropy bugs. AI has clearly been shown to be more more adept at auditing code than humans.
Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#9Coldcard Security Advisory: https://blog.coinkite.com/coldcard-mk3-seed-generation-warni...
Re: Coldcard's $38M (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody
#10>>> To every other developer: we believe this is a sober reality of the new AI paradigm. AI-assisted code review can now find latent bugs at a speed that is outpacing even the industry’s most seasoned experts. If your firmware is open-source or has ever been public, assume it's already being read by attackers and defenders alike.
Kinda turns the “many eyes” principle of OSS on its head, eh?