Using an open model feels surprisingly good
matthewsaltz.com
Using an open model feels surprisingly good
1–10 of 157 posts
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#2It surprises me that this concept took as long as it did to gain traction in… hacker news. 15 years ago folks here were compiling kernels and gentoo distros. Lately it’s been “you should just pay the man, it’s cheaper than running these things yourself”
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#3It surprises me that this concept took as long as it did to gain traction in… hacker news. 15 years ago folks here were compiling kernels and gentoo distros. Lately it’s been “you should just pay the man, it’s cheaper than running these things yourself”
Rsync the dropbox, dude
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#4this seems to be an advertisement for Modal. is it really your own infrastructure if the hardware is leased?
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#5Actually, if you break tasks down into small enough units, there's not much difference between open models and closed models. The only reason to use agents is the hope that they'll work with natural language input—but that's where the difficulty lies.
For example, if you modify things at the level of small functions, open models seem to perform just as wel
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#6GLM 5.2 feels better than Opus and K3 is as good as Fable.
Now I can't wait for someone to distill K3 into a Qwen 3.6 27b or Poolside S 2.1 sized models for a proper fast local Composer 2.5 replacement.
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#7It surprises me that this concept took as long as it did to gain traction in… hacker news. 15 years ago folks here were compiling kernels and gentoo distros. Lately it’s been “you should just pay the man, it’s cheaper than running these things yourself”
Rolling your own Linux is nearly free and could be done on any computer you had lying around. Dropping >$5k on a computer to run a local model (badly) doesn't really scratch my "hacker" itch. The author of this article works for an AI infrastructure company and ran Kimi K3 on their infrastructure - this post reads like marketing.
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#8To be honest, I am surprised by how good DeepSeek V4 Flash is. I use Claude Code and Codex on Claude 5 Opus and GPT-5.6 Sol most of the time, but when I use DS V4 Flash I don't feel like it's really that bad. And with oh-my-pi and just plain pi it's pretty good. To be honest the frontier models are much better at tool calling so in an assistant flow they're better but I did the dumb thing and optimized the harness for the model instead, rewriting the tools so they match what it guesses at, and DS V4 Flash does just fine.
The TTFT and tok/s are much higher on the small model so that makes it competitive for a bunch of things. It feels like what old Sonnet used to by the end of last year which is honestly damned good.
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#9This is only a thinly veiled ad. It's fine, I was curious about this exact setup, anyways.
What would be useful is a cost metric. I'm curious how much I'd be willing to spend as a premium to not have those companies piping my conversations directly to the NSA. Maybe only some conversations? Claude and OpenAI are heavily subsidized, by all accounts, so Kimi K3 on a private endpoint might end up costing more or less - that's what I want to know.
Re: Using an open model feels surprisingly good
#10This is such a poor quality post, reads more like a diary entry than a substantive technical post.