"Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
1–10 of 110 posts
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#2https://www.tryai.dev/?error=server_error&error_code=unexpec...
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#3Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#4Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#5I think this is just an ad.
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#6Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#7Seriously, what's going on there ? Why is it so different from others? Is it just behind technologically/training wise or it's using something fundamentally different?
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#8Useless They are not image generation models.
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#9Grok! LOL! Seriously, what's going on there ? Why is it so different from others? Is it just behind technologically/training wise or it's using something fundamentally different?
Re: "Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok
#10Useless They are not image generation models.
Not useless. LLMs are the most general purpose computer algorithms ever created. They are getting smarter and cheaper at a geometric rate. What is a bad idea today could have useful applications tomorrow.
Citation needed - my company is paying more than ever for code generation. I have no reason to believe (given anecdotes) that anyone finds themselves in the opposite situation.