DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#2That includes a Henry County police officer who was fired and arrested last week following an investigation into his access of the Flock network, authorities there said.
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#3Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#4Yes, devil's advocate could say if standard citizens can't, no one can. Just seems so minor it's not worth losing a job over. All other cases (including plates of family which you don't directly own), yes, investigate fully and apply appropriate actions.
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#5I'm not sure what to think here. Legitimate misuse, sure. But the article says at least one person only looked up their own license plate. I feel like that should be considered acceptable. It's not law enforcement usage specifically, but can't I grant myself the right to see information on my own vehicle? Yes, devil's advocate could say if standard citizens can't, no one can. Just seems so minor it's not worth losing…
Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#6Traditional look-up software is probably being misused by cops all the time (à la the old noir trope of a PI having "a buddy in the department" who can look up anything for him).
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#7I'm not sure what to think here. Legitimate misuse, sure. But the article says at least one person only looked up their own license plate. I feel like that should be considered acceptable. It's not law enforcement usage specifically, but can't I grant myself the right to see information on my own vehicle? Yes, devil's advocate could say if standard citizens can't, no one can. Just seems so minor it's not worth losing…
> I feel like that should be considered acceptable Not if they're married and their spouse also drives the vehicle.
Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#8Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#9Re: DeKalb deputy charged with Flock camera misuse; more Georgia officers fired
#10I'm not sure what to think here. Legitimate misuse, sure. But the article says at least one person only looked up their own license plate. I feel like that should be considered acceptable. It's not law enforcement usage specifically, but can't I grant myself the right to see information on my own vehicle? Yes, devil's advocate could say if standard citizens can't, no one can. Just seems so minor it's not worth losing…