Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#2[deleted]
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#3Thanks. I needed that reminder to sometimes NOT just solve a matrix of 3000 * 3000 equations and merely make an assumption and take an integral, metaphorically.
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#4Not an average software engineer--beautiful page (imperfect spelling)!
Why does detection scale as the 4th root of the RCS? Nice problem for the radiation theory part of a graduate electrodynamics class.
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#5The instant I realize it's an LLM generated piece. I'm out. Thanks for adding all the animations to make it abundantly obvious.
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#6The instant I realize it's an LLM generated piece. I'm out. Thanks for adding all the animations to make it abundantly obvious.
What animations ?
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#7The instant I realize it's an LLM generated piece. I'm out. Thanks for adding all the animations to make it abundantly obvious.
the footer says "made by hand, mostly." not sure what that means, though!
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#8Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#9The instant I realize it's an LLM generated piece. I'm out. Thanks for adding all the animations to make it abundantly obvious.
[deleted]
Re: Recreating the math behind the first stealth aircraft
#10>where RR is the distance from the target (imagine the radar being very far away) en.wikipedia.org . This formula might look intimidating, so let's break it down:
You didn't even read your own slop. Why should anybody else?