Live data from Hacker News

Alternative(s) to run CUDA on non-Nvidia hardware

hpcwire.com

1–10 of 82 posts

Re: Alternative(s) to run CUDA on non-Nvidia hardware

#4
post #3
post #2

Most of these "alternatives" focus on CUDA C++, and overlook what actually makes CUDA interesting. Already in 2020, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cuda-refresher-the-gpu-com...

We're actually targeting all of it, and not just CUDA C++.

Including stuff like Fortran, Haskell, Java, .NET via PTX, Python JIT, IDE tooling integration with major IDEs, graphical GPU debugging and profiling, libraries and co?

Then I guess all the best.

Re: Alternative(s) to run CUDA on non-Nvidia hardware

#5
post #3
post #2

Most of these "alternatives" focus on CUDA C++, and overlook what actually makes CUDA interesting. Already in 2020, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cuda-refresher-the-gpu-com...

We're actually targeting all of it, and not just CUDA C++.

Ambitious but neat, good luck if nothing else :)

If you were to guess, when do you think your Nsight Compute alternative might be ready with your own toolchain?

Re: Alternative(s) to run CUDA on non-Nvidia hardware

#9
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're actually targeting all of it, and not just CUDA C++.

Including stuff like Fortran, Haskell, Java, .NET via PTX, Python JIT, IDE tooling integration with major IDEs, graphical GPU debugging and profiling, libraries and co? Then I guess all the best.

This post has some serious peanut-gallery vibes.
Post reply on HN