UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#2https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558511
Kids get all the benefits of social media and have a creative outlet, and also a parent, trusted operator, or even the kid maintains control of the platform.
Making user-to-user apps banned seems like a giant overstep and inconsiderate.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#3I wonder what UK thinks about private social media or a model similar to the one I've tried to create with nanogram. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558511 Kids get all the benefits of social media and have a creative outlet, and also a parent, trusted operator, or even the kid maintains control of the platform. Making user-to-user apps banned seems like a giant overstep and inconsiderate.
Instead, we're just trying to avoid focus on realistic regulatory concerns for global oligarchs.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#4I wonder what UK thinks about private social media or a model similar to the one I've tried to create with nanogram. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558511 Kids get all the benefits of social media and have a creative outlet, and also a parent, trusted operator, or even the kid maintains control of the platform. Making user-to-user apps banned seems like a giant overstep and inconsiderate.
So, it really looks like we should ban most social media via regulatory controls _INSIDE_ their offices. Instead, we're just trying to avoid focus on realistic regulatory concerns for global oligarchs.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#5I wonder what UK thinks about private social media or a model similar to the one I've tried to create with nanogram. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558511 Kids get all the benefits of social media and have a creative outlet, and also a parent, trusted operator, or even the kid maintains control of the platform. Making user-to-user apps banned seems like a giant overstep and inconsiderate.
UK doesn't think, UK government thinks 1984 is a great manual.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#6I wonder what UK thinks about private social media or a model similar to the one I've tried to create with nanogram. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558511 Kids get all the benefits of social media and have a creative outlet, and also a parent, trusted operator, or even the kid maintains control of the platform. Making user-to-user apps banned seems like a giant overstep and inconsiderate.
> I wonder what UK thinks UK doesn't think, UK government thinks 1984 is a great manual.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, it really looks like we should ban most social media via regulatory controls _INSIDE_ their offices. Instead, we're just trying to avoid focus on realistic regulatory concerns for global oligarchs.
'No that's too hard let's just ban them them all and require age verification for everyone'...
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#8This is Paul Joseph Watson's website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Joseph_Watson
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
'No that's too hard let's just ban them them all and require age verification for everyone'...
so 4chan always used "((()))" for their racism. Perhaps we need to implement Postgresql $$$oligarchs$$$ around things that are clearly being implemented because doing the right thing would bother $$$them$$$.
Re: UK's Social Media Ban: The Monumental Pretext for Total Digital Surveillance
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
so 4chan always used "((()))" for their racism. Perhaps we need to implement Postgresql $$$oligarchs$$$ around things that are clearly being implemented because doing the right thing would bother $$$them$$$.
I want my kids to swim in the creek