Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
1–10 of 382 posts
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#2It was an excuse to fuck with them, just like the "supply chain risk" finding a few months back.
(See, for example: https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/2065897156226015690)
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#3Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#4As in worried about other countries/organizations using Fable 5 to actually do decent cyber security.
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#5Well this makes it sound the feds were less worried about someone using Fable 5 to attack them , but were worried about someone using Fable 5 to prevent the Feds from attacking others ... As in worried about other countries/organizations using Fable 5 to actually do decent cyber security.
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#6You _cannot_ say that Mythos is super dangerous and can only be rolled out to certain people, but then release Fable with anything other than bulletproof cyber denials.
Clearly with LLMs, bulletproof denials are ~impossible due to the way LLMs work.
So you've ended up in a situation where Anthropic are simultaneously claiming it's a incredibly dangerous model _and_ there are (minor, potentially) problems with the security "protections".
As technical people we understand that nothing can be perfect, esp in LLM world. But all my non technical friends were really confused how they had managed to make the model "safe" so quickly when it was released and the general sentiment was it shouldn't have been released - and now to an outsider I think it looks like it was never safe at all to release, so I can totally see how the current US administration have got themselves very upset with it.
_Even if_ there was no political bad will, it's a bit of a silly scenario to end up in, and really quite easily foreseen.
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#7So, basically the model didn't agree to expose possible vulnerabilities but agree to patch those?
Regardless of the request to take Fable 5 down. Why is requesting the model to show vulnerabilities is being blocked if fixing it not? is it based on the assumption of the intention?
I don't quite get the benefit of limiting it. So if anyone can explain it better it'll be appreciated.
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#8Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#9Like it basically jail broke the "no security vul guard rails" not in any clever way but just by fixing them, producing exploit code just by writing test cases making sure it's fixed. So you just need to look at the code & tests as a human to get vulnerabilities and exploits(components).
What makes this so beautiful IMHO is that it's a trivial jail break, but also a close to unfixable. At least not without making the model close to useless for normal development (it refuses to fix bugs/write code) or making it a major liability (it silently pretends it didn't see bugs and silently avoids fixing it, which for a human would count as intentional sabotage and might involve criminal liability).
Re: Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers
#10If you set aside political menace, this is a huge problem with Anthropic's strategy. You _cannot_ say that Mythos is super dangerous and can only be rolled out to certain people, but then release Fable with anything other than bulletproof cyber denials. Clearly with LLMs, bulletproof denials are ~impossible due to the way LLMs work. So you've ended up in a situation where Anthropic are simultaneously claiming it's a…
The genie is out of the bottle either way.
Unless we believe Anthropic has a wizard or superhero secreted away that no one else can replicate.