Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Commodore Releases Flip Phone

commodore.net

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 139 posts

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#3

Post by butchkass » 

  -> $500   
  -> Corny nostalgia-bait   
  -> No web browser   
  -> No social media   
  -> System-level DNS blocking
Lmfao. What even is the point of this ? I could see an argument for not allowing to install social media apps, but blocking me arbitrarily from even accessing them through a browser is crazy. The OS is Linux-based too, so there’s no technical constraint, they just went out of their way to add always-on parental control.

For $500 (FIVE HUNDRED) you get a $30 dumb phone with Whatsapp. Wow.

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#4

Post by wewewedxfgdf »

butchkass wrote: post #3

-> $500 -> Corny nostalgia-bait -> No web browser -> No social media -> System-level DNS blocking Lmfao. What even is the point of this ? I could see an argument for not allowing to install social media apps, but blocking me arbitrarily from even accessing them through a browser is crazy. The OS is Linux-based too, so there’s no technical constraint, they just went out of their way to add always-on parental control.…

The new Commodore seems to see itself not as a retro nostalgia vintage computer company, but an anti social media company - which explains this product.

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#6

Post by jhbadger »

wewewedxfgdf wrote: post #2

Seems a major shift in direction and a major distraction. I don't think the renewed Commodore will last too long. If you want a brand new C64 get em before they become .... collectors items.

I honestly don't think Perryfractic would be that sad if it doesn't last (assuming he, Lady Fractic, and child and dogs don't become homeless in the bankruptcy) He knows perfectly well that the audience for Commodore nostalgia is small and aging and is just enjoying being part of the scene while it lasts.

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#7

Post by st_goliath »

This is really confusing brand/product combination. Who is it trying to appeal to?

I'm pretty sure the people who have fond memories of growing up with a C64 or watching ToS are of an entirely different generation than those with fond memories of flip phones and cyber/color-puke ads for transparent plastic gadgets.

> BASIC Beige Edition

There's a missed opportunity for a better ToS joke here: "Beige... the final frontier"

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#8

Post by rob74 »

grvbck wrote: post #5

I really want to like this, but does it bring anything new to the table? I see the same low-effort buzzwords I've seen on other "dumb" phones. And the design…it looks like a Motorola.

Well yeah, it looks like a Motorola, and the Motorola flip phones looked like the Star Trek TOS communicators (which they acknowledged by calling their first flip phone the "StarTAC"). And the article also references Star Trek. Sure, the kind of nostalgic people that are in the market for a Commodore phone probably also have the same feelings about Star Trek, so why not...

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#9

Post by Gracana »

Retrocomputing Roundtable has talked about the new Commodore company over the course of a couple episodes, and I thought they brought up a good point about “what is it that people actually want from Commodore,” and the best answer they came up with is “to be 12 again.”

A new C64 with modern video output, a disk emulator, a SID chip replacement so you don’t need an original… that’s all good, but beyond that, it’s hard to say. This phone, though? I don’t think anyone saw that coming, and I don’t see how this could possibly be the right move.

Re: Commodore Releases Flip Phone

#10

Post by Anonasty »

butchkass wrote: post #3

-> $500 -> Corny nostalgia-bait -> No web browser -> No social media -> System-level DNS blocking Lmfao. What even is the point of this ? I could see an argument for not allowing to install social media apps, but blocking me arbitrarily from even accessing them through a browser is crazy. The OS is Linux-based too, so there’s no technical constraint, they just went out of their way to add always-on parental control.…

Then it's not literally for you and people who are dependent on social media. It's almost like there is a growing populace who don't want to be there 24/7. Also most people would access the needed sites or social media via laptop or desktop. Not to mention that you feel that it's "corny nostalgia-bait" gives me vibes that you are younger than the target audience of this device even is.
Post reply on HN