Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
1–10 of 66 posts
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#2Fudge, I really need to carve out time today to play with zeroserve. Very cool stuff
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#3From a technical standpoint, these are always impressive projects, but I've always wondered: has anyone ever encountered a use case where the Caddy was the bottleneck?
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#4I am surprised how well nginx holds up?!
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#5From a technical standpoint, these are always impressive projects, but I've always wondered: has anyone ever encountered a use case where the Caddy was the bottleneck?
[dead]
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#6I still think of eBPF as not being Turing-complete. There is still a complexity limit in the verifier. Even if someone did implement Game of Life by having the program set a timer to run itself. https://isovalent.com/blog/post/ebpf-yes-its-turing-complete...
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#7I still think of eBPF as not being Turing-complete. There is still a complexity limit in the verifier. Even if someone did implement Game of Life by having the program set a timer to run itself. https://isovalent.com/blog/post/ebpf-yes-its-turing-complete...
zeroserve doesn't use the Linux kernel's eBPF runtime to run the eBPF it uses, so the constraints of the Linux kernel's eBPF runtime (chosen because of how the Linux kernel thinks about protecting the Linux kernel from user space) don't apply to zeroserve (or other tools that use the eBPF instruction set but don't use the Linux kernel's particular implementation)
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#8No ACME! That is a dealbreaker
https://github.com/losfair/zeroserve/blob/main/CADDY_COMPAT....
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#9No ACME! That is a dealbreaker https://github.com/losfair/zeroserve/blob/main/CADDY_COMPAT....
Yes, I agree it would be very nice to have a way to integrate ACME into zeroserve. I'm not sure if zeroserve's plugin system might allow one to add a plugin to support it?
Re: Caddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
#10Anyone else got a really weird Chorme pop-up asking which cert to use for su3.io:443?
Very bizarre, never seen that before.
Thumbprints:
- 60949a09aab8677f87a0b9eda7099a03ca510fb3
- 1b146798f0dc93773247e86312f1b730c4eeebb3