An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#2Not LaTeX...
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#3Not LaTeX...
So... ?
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#4Not LaTeX...
DABM writes everything in MS Word.
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#5Not LaTeX...
[deleted]
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#6Genuine question: does the writing tool matter at all here if the exposition is clear and mathematically correct? I’ve seen great notes written in Word, LaTeX, and even slides—quality seems independent of format.
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#7(2019). No exercises.
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#8Genuine question: does the writing tool matter at all here if the exposition is clear and mathematically correct? I’ve seen great notes written in Word, LaTeX, and even slides—quality seems independent of format.
I would say it's not statistically independent. See https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=304 item #1. So we get to add another exception, which is fine.
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#9That sure is one compact document. Pun intended. The document is very readable too.
Re: An introduction to functional analysis for science and engineering
#10Seem reasonably concise, but I think Kreyzsig's Introduction to Functional Analysis with Applications fills the "gap" that this paper wants to fill. It's readable, has applications, exercises, and is more complete.