Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
techcrunch.com
Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
1–10 of 383 posts
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#2Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#3Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#4He's essentially saying that C-suite people overestimate how effective LLMs are at one-shotting hard problems, and underestimate the human maintenance work that follows.
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#5also clickbait title
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#6In other words, only people who are afraid their point won't stand on its own merits would resort to saying "X is suffering from AI psychosis." An idea is true or false on its own. If you're resorting to labels, you're just trying to automatically win the argument, instead of saying something substantive or interesting.
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#7Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#8Clickbait title. Should be more like "Box founder Aaron Levie says CEOs should use AI more and learn its limitations." He's essentially saying that C-suite people overestimate how effective LLMs are at one-shotting hard problems, and underestimate the human maintenance work that follows.
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#9Using "psychosis" is a cheap rhetorical trick. There's no need to label something "psychosis" when making your point, except to automatically discredit whatever you're responding to. In other words, only people who are afraid their point won't stand on its own merits would resort to saying "X is suffering from AI psychosis." An idea is true or false on its own. If you're resorting to labels, you're just trying to aut…
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#10Clickbait title. Should be more like "Box founder Aaron Levie says CEOs should use AI more and learn its limitations." He's essentially saying that C-suite people overestimate how effective LLMs are at one-shotting hard problems, and underestimate the human maintenance work that follows.