What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
1–10 of 78 posts
Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#2Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#3Shows the pretentiousness of the twitterati more than anything else
Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#4Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#5Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#6Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#7No one has ever claimed AI cannot imitate a Monet, but however good the imitation, it still isn't art any more than a Xerox of a painting is art. This is the exact reason why most people feel bad after discovering that what they felt was work of human ingenuity, is just a fake, a simulacrum of it. The creation of art, arguably the most human of instincts, cannot be separated from the emotions and effort that went into it.
All this proves is that most people cannot tell if that picture is a Monet or not.
Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#8Re: What happens when you post a real Monet and say it's AI?
#9It’s not a physical painting made by a well known artist.
It’s trying to hard to be a late Monet.
How much of our opinions are driven by context, rather than the actual subject? If Monet’s work is not so great without the context, is it still great? Or is context a critical piece of the art itself? Do we need to view a Monet piece within the scope of other Monet pieces, other artists, time periods, blindness, etc?