OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
1–10 of 500 posts
Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#2Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#3o1 is several generations old and was released in 2024. Is this some quite old research that took a long time to get published?
Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#4o1 is several generations old and was released in 2024. Is this some quite old research that took a long time to get published?
Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#5Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#6Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#7Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#8They aren't going to take a stab at an uncommon diagnosis even if it occurs to them, if they might get sued if they're wrong.
Edit: I'm not trying to say Doctors deliberately diagnose wrong. Just that if there are two possible diagnoses, one common that matches some of the symptoms and one rare that matches all symptoms, doctors are still much more likely to diagnose the common one. Hoofbeats, horses, zebras, etc
Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#9Re: OpenAI’s o1 correctly diagnosed 67% of ER patients vs. 50-55% by triage doctors
#10Humans could not diagnose and treat me correctly . They almost killed me. Curious where I could feed my symptoms and the same data I gave to an ER to an AI to test it.