U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
getdatingphotos.com
U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#2Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#3Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#4Very curious to see if the <0.95 places are home to large women’s prisons. In the western states they seem pretty randomly located in rural areas.
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#5Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#6The truth is I came up with this a few years ago because I wanted to try living in a different city and wanted to make sure it didn't have a worse gender ratio than the one I'd been living in. I'm a man so it made sense to find one that has more women than men. I know some people find it weird to use statistics for dating purposes. Well, I can't seem to not be a weird person no matter how hard I try, so I'll just own it. Anyhow, one thing that my project did that this one doesn't seem to is break down the numbers by people who are unmarried vs married, education levels, etc. It also included corrections based on data from Gallup in regards to what percentage of single people are interested in dating vs wanting to remain single. I remember there were some cases where a place looked like a sea of women but if I adjusted the numbers to exclude married people then the resulting gender ratios were way less skewed.
Ultimately, I think culture matters more than gender ratios. I'm not gonna say where it was that I was loving for a while (which was influenced by my analysis), but I will say that I in part chose it for having a highly educated population; I found that I was definitely judged harshly for being a self taught person with no degree. Where I'm from very few people care that much. My point being you can move somewhere with lots more single women than men and end up no more successful at dating, if not less.
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#7edit: In case I must spell it out scoring people like this is weird. Also his own photo is terrible. I'm rarely so negative but seriously guys please save your money.
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#8Why are Southern states so female-heavy?
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#9As a single woman still barely holding onto this age bracket (praying to the power of anonymity right now), the fact that this exists and is so clearly targeted at men who honestly look fine for such a high price is sad. If you told me you spent this much money on your profile to meet me, I would immediately subtract whatever smart and attractive points I unconsciously added to you and add them to your insecurity sco…
Yeah for two thousand dollars a person could go on a trip and bring back an interesting story, or get therapy, or a puppy. Could probably do all three, actually.
Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34
#10As a single woman still barely holding onto this age bracket (praying to the power of anonymity right now), the fact that this exists and is so clearly targeted at men who honestly look fine for such a high price is sad. If you told me you spent this much money on your profile to meet me, I would immediately subtract whatever smart and attractive points I unconsciously added to you and add them to your insecurity sco…
Thanks for the feedback, I've replaced my own photo with a good one.
> I'm rarely so negative but seriously guys please save your money.
You can do it all 100% free per the guide which describes the process end-to-end: https://nsokolsky.substack.com/p/how-to-take-a-perfect-datin...