GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
openai.com
GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
1–10 of 114 posts
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#2This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#3> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#4> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#5> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
How is that a scam? You don't get participation awards for solving half of a puzzle...
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#6> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#7> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Well, that depends on how you set up the bounty program. What if I find a solution, share it to a friend so that both of us can claim the prize?
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#8> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
Well, that depends on how you set up the bounty program. What if I find a solution, share it to a friend so that both of us can claim the prize?
after the 1st bug is found, no payout for any other of the bugs
Re: GPT‑5.5 Bio Bug Bounty
#9> $25,000 to the first true universal jailbreak to clear all five questions. This program is a complete scam. Even if 100 people find "bugs", they will only pay out to one person.
that's not the point even. They are attempting to build credibility in two ways: 1. this model is SO advanced that there are huge risks, never before considered. 2. we're doing the super-responsible thing in incentivizing work that addresses this. #1 is unproven and frankly, unlikely, which makes #2 meaningless. The fact that the "prize" is so low & structured this was suggests that they're not that concerned but do…