We sped up bun by 100x
vers.sh
We sped up bun by 100x
1–10 of 68 posts
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#2with a different git client
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47618895 to discuss the git implementation
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#3[deleted]
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#4Aside: That font is really hard on my eyes. Anyone else?
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#5This blog post calls libgit2 "git's C library" as if it is in any way related to git. I don't think it is.
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#6What it cost doesn't actually say what it cost. I wonder what models they used. Napkin math of Opus for everything (probably not true) with no caching suggests $67,000.
Cool article though!
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#7So, they implemented a git client in zig, that had some significant speedups for their usecase. However:
> The git CLI test suite consists of 21,329 individual assertions for various git subcommands (that way we can be certain ziggit does suffice as a drop-in replacement for git).
> While we only got through part of the overall test suite, that's still the equivalent of a month's worth of straight developer work (again, without sleep or eating factored in).
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#8[flagged]
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#9Aside: That font is really hard on my eyes. Anyone else?
The dark mode looks better. In the light mode they have to improve the contrast. The lines in the visualisations are almost invisible, also the data table on the left
https://vers.sh/hdr_legacy/images/manager_vs_manager_of_mana...
Re: We sped up bun by 100x
#10Aside: That font is really hard on my eyes. Anyone else?
Yeah. I was going to suggest Firefox Reader Mode, but it fails miserably on this particular site for some reason. Ublock Origin's "disable remote fonts", still works great on this site though.