Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 60 posts

Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#1

Post by bhaviav100 »

My agents retry a bit more than it should, and there goes my bill up in the sky. I tried figuring out what is causing this but none of the tools helped much.

and the worse thing for me is that everything shows up as aggregate usage. Total tokens, total cost, maybe per model.

So I ended up hacking together a thin layer in front of OpenAI where every request is forced to carry some context (agent, task, user, team), and then just logging and calculating cost per call and putting some basic limits on top so you can actually block something if it starts going off the rails. It’s very barebones, but even just seeing “this agent + this task = this cost” was a big relief.

It uses your own OpenAI key, so it’s not doing anything magical on the execution side, just observing and enforcing.

I want to know you guys are dealing with this right now. Are you just watching aggregate usage and trusting it, or have you built something to break it down per agent / task?

If useful, here is the rough version I’m using : https://authority.bhaviavelayudhan.com/

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#3

Post by rox_kd »

In what settings do you mean - there are multiple strategies, I think building your own compaction layer in front seems a bit over-kill ? have you considered implementing some cache strategy, otherwise summary pipelines - I made once an agent which based on the messages routed things to a smaller model for compaction / summaries to bring down the context, for the main agent.

But also ensuring you start new fresh context threads, instead of banging through a single one untill your whole feature is done .. working in small atomic incrementals works pretty good

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#4

Post by DarthCeltic85 »

I had gotten a student/ultra code for antigravity promo for three months, so I was using that, but that finally ran out this month. Currently Im using windstream and flipping between claude as my left brain and code extraction and the higher context but cheaperish models there.

honestly though, im getting to a point where im running custom project mds that flip between different models for different things, using list outputs depending on what it finds and runs. (I have two monorepo projects, and one thats a polyglot microengine that jumps using gRPC communication.)

The mds are highly specialized for each project as each project deals with vastly different issues. Cycling through the different pro accounts and keeping the mds in place over it all is helping me not kill my wallet.

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#5

Post by bhaviav100 »

rox_kd wrote: post #3

In what settings do you mean - there are multiple strategies, I think building your own compaction layer in front seems a bit over-kill ? have you considered implementing some cache strategy, otherwise summary pipelines - I made once an agent which based on the messages routed things to a smaller model for compaction / summaries to bring down the context, for the main agent. But also ensuring you start new fresh cont…

yes, compaction and smaller models help on cost per step.

But my issue wasn’t just inefficiency, it was agents retrying when they shouldn’t.

I needed visibility + limits per agent/task, and the ability to cut it off, not just optimize it.

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#6

Post by bhaviav100 »

DarthCeltic85 wrote: post #4

I had gotten a student/ultra code for antigravity promo for three months, so I was using that, but that finally ran out this month. Currently Im using windstream and flipping between claude as my left brain and code extraction and the higher context but cheaperish models there. honestly though, im getting to a point where im running custom project mds that flip between different models for different things, using lis…

hmm interesting model routing + specialized MDs makes sense for cost efficiency.

I’m seeing a different failure mode though that even with good routing, agents are looping or retrying and burning my money.

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#7

Post by DarthCeltic85 »

bhaviav100 wrote: post #6
DarthCeltic85 wrote: post #4

I had gotten a student/ultra code for antigravity promo for three months, so I was using that, but that finally ran out this month. Currently Im using windstream and flipping between claude as my left brain and code extraction and the higher context but cheaperish models there. honestly though, im getting to a point where im running custom project mds that flip between different models for different things, using lis…

hmm interesting model routing + specialized MDs makes sense for cost efficiency. I’m seeing a different failure mode though that even with good routing, agents are looping or retrying and burning my money.

[dead]

Re: Ask HN: How are you keeping AI coding agents from burning money?

#9

Post by jerome_mc »

AI outputs often feel like a gacha game. Paradoxically, the 'expensive' tokens are sometimes the cheapest in the long run. In my experience, higher-end models have a much higher 'one-shot' success rate. You aren't just saving on total token count by avoiding loops; you’re saving engineering time, which is always the most expensive resource anyway.
Post reply on HN