CSS is DOOMed
nielsleenheer.com
CSS is DOOMed
1–10 of 120 posts
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#2I guess I am asking, if modern CSS is so awesome, it's awesome compared to what exactly?
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#3Re: CSS is DOOMed
#4Is CSS that awesome? It's still a language designed for styling webpages with 30 year of added features. I'd argue something purpose built would be a much better tool for the potential usecases people try to use CSS for now. I guess I am asking, if modern CSS is so awesome, it's awesome compared to what exactly?
Duct tape is awesome for the same reason -- even though there are several effective use cases for duct tape where a different tool would technically be "better" for the job.
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#5Re: CSS is DOOMed
#6With how these things are going, soon hackers will be challenging themselves to run Crysis on calculators and microwaves
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#7But there's a lot more CSS features now. While in the past, Turing completeness in CSS required humans to click on checkboxes, now CSS can emulate an entire CPU without JavaScript or requiring user interaction.[1] So I wonder if DOOM could be purely CSS too, in real time.
[0]: https://keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/ [1]: https://lyra.horse/x86css/
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#8Re: CSS is DOOMed
#9Is CSS that awesome? It's still a language designed for styling webpages with 30 year of added features. I'd argue something purpose built would be a much better tool for the potential usecases people try to use CSS for now. I guess I am asking, if modern CSS is so awesome, it's awesome compared to what exactly?
You can keep it high level but your comment makes me think you have something in mind, and I'm honestly curious.
Re: CSS is DOOMed
#10Is CSS that awesome? It's still a language designed for styling webpages with 30 year of added features. I'd argue something purpose built would be a much better tool for the potential usecases people try to use CSS for now. I guess I am asking, if modern CSS is so awesome, it's awesome compared to what exactly?