Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
1–10 of 73 posts
Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#2Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#3Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#4Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#5Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#6The way Alex Karp views himself is scary; he gives himself (and his company) carte blanche when it comes to morality. He's basically become the Jack Nicholson character from A Few Good Men.
Yes, America needs technology to succeed. But it can't be unchecked.
Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#7Is the problem what those things are used for, or is it the way Palantir does it?
Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#8Not trying to be contrarian here, but I don’t get the problem. What’s wrong with Palantir producing weapons or military intelligence? How is it different from making guns? Is the problem what those things are used for, or is it the way Palantir does it?
Edit: I see I'm being downvoted. What is your argument in favor of this? How big of a degenerate, amoral, psychopath do you have to be to justify this?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/14/lebanon-israel...
"Israel has carried out at least 37 attacks against healthcare workers and facilities in Lebanon, including against the state civil defence and Lebanese Red Cross, since the current hostilities began, Lebanese authorities said.
The war in Lebanon started on 2 March after Hezbollah launched a volley of rockets at Israel, triggering a swift Israeli bombing campaign across the country. Fighting has since escalated, with Hezbollah continuing its rocket fire and Israeli troops invading south Lebanon.
At least 826 people have been killed in Lebanon by Israeli strikes, according to the ministry of health, and about 1 million have been displaced."
Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#9[flagged]
Re: Palantir defends its role in the kill chain
#10[flagged]
Not everything is subjective, and not every debate is worthy of middle ground. Sometimes, and I would argue autonomous kill robots is one of those times, just sometimes it's not really worth negotiating on. What would be the middle ground here? Just a little autonomous killing as a treat?