Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
grandforksherald.com
Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
1–10 of 417 posts
Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#2> Her bank records showed she was more than 1,200 miles away, at home in Tennessee at the same time police claimed she was in Fargo committing fraud.
> Unable to pay her bills from jail, she lost her home, her car and even her dog
Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#3https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/12/tennessee-gr... - Another article on this without a paywall.
It's annoying that both articles are calling this AI error. This was human error, the police did the wrong thing and the people of Fargo will end up paying for this fuckup.
Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#4Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#5Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#6Edit: this is in reference to the original headline "AI error jails innocent grandmother for months in North Dakota fraud case" not the revised title that it was changed to.
Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#7Though, the question remains: are the tools built in such a way as to deceive the user into a false sense of trust or certainty?
_Some_ of the blame lies on the UX here. It must.
Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#8Re: Innocent woman jailed after being misidentified using AI facial recognition
#9I hate this headline (not blaming submitter). Police incompetence and negligence jailed her for months and left her stranded in a North Dakota winter. The AI is no more responsible than the cars and airplanes they used. Edit: this is in reference to the original headline "AI error jails innocent grandmother for months in North Dakota fraud case" not the revised title that it was changed to.