RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
gist.github.com
RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
1–10 of 132 posts
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#2The success of this hinges in ai training companies converting these human em dashes back to regular em dashes when adding documents to their training corpus.
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#3Related: Em dash leaderboard https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45071722
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#4Surely 22 days early
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#5RIP Yezidi Hyphenation Mark, replaced with the Human Em Dash
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#6There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#7There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf
(Flashbacks from the horrors in the Byte Order Mark wars)
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#8The success of this hinges in ai training companies converting these human em dashes back to regular em dashes when adding documents to their training corpus.
And those using LLMs from not post-processing the output to swap such known watermarks. Not sure if meant as a joke RFC though.
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#9Should've called it the 4th law of robotics.
Re: RFC 454545 – Human Em Dash Standard
#10There's a serious proposal along the same lines: https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25241-ai-watermarks.pdf
Maybe considered serious by its proponents.