IMG_0416 (2024)
ben-mini.com
IMG_0416 (2024)
1–10 of 50 posts
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#2IMG_0416 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42102506 - Nov 2024 (324 comments)
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#3Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#4It’s wild how antique the iPhone interface design looks. It’s not THAT old.
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#5Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#6There's something borderline "voyeuristic" (for want of a better term) about it. There are all these videos that are public, I'm allowed to watch them, but they were clearly not meant for me to watch. It's like when you see a family photo at a Goodwill or something.
It's definitely worth trying out if you get bored; it's a proper time capsule. There's absolutely nothing cynical about it; these videos weren't made for profit, they weren't made to sell you something. They're candid videos of people as they were in ~2010.
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#7It’s wild how antique the iPhone interface design looks. It’s not THAT old.
Yeah in comparison OSX Mountain Lion or Windows 8 look basically the same as the modern desktop OSes, while mobile releases from that era look totally different. I suppose it had only been 5 years since the release of the iPhone so there was still a lot of experimentation
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#8It’s wild how antique the iPhone interface design looks. It’s not THAT old.
I am aware screen size has increased tremendously, even then I think the buttons were still quite huge compared to the size of today's tappable links.
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#9It’s wild how antique the iPhone interface design looks. It’s not THAT old.
It seems our fingers have gotten thinner, or more skillful at tapping at relatively tinier buttons now. Look at how huge those buttons are. I am aware screen size has increased tremendously, even then I think the buttons were still quite huge compared to the size of today's tappable links.
Being able to detect the middle-point of a fat finger wasn't a 1.0 feature
Re: IMG_0416 (2024)
#10Previously... IMG_0416 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42102506 - Nov 2024 (324 comments)