Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
1–10 of 354 posts
Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#2Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#3Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#4Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#5Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#6Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#7In case you missed that and were impressed by the bullshit language used. ;-)
Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#8Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#9Synergy is a great example - what the person saying it hopes you understand is that Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros have a complimentary set of skills that when put together will be more profitable. What they actually mean is that when we merge these two companies we're going to have two sets of sales teams, two sets of marketing teams, two production teams, two sets of HR, accounts, back office etc. And so we're going to be more efficient because everyone I just mentioned is going to be fired.
So yeah of course, the intent is to trick you and the likelihood of success is (inversely) proportional to how smart you are and it turns out if you're smart you probably also do other parts of your job well.
Re: Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs
#10There is a grotesquely pulsing layer of overconfident dumbasses in business (and society in general) and this is the language they speak. My job at any company, as far as I can see it, is to make sure my local orbit is cleared of these wackos. They are parasitic extractors of value and soul.