Live data from Hacker News

Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise

wikimediastatus.net

1–10 of 405 posts

Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise

#1
https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14555

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(techni...

https://old.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1rllcdg/megathre...

Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise
wikimediastatus.net

Re: Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise

#2
Additional context:

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=14555

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(techni...

https://old.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1rllcdg/megathre...

Apparent JS worm payload: https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B...

Re: Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise

#7
post #6

[flagged]

"The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, reported a total revenue of $185.4 million for the 2023–2024 fiscal year (ending June 2024). The majority of this funding comes from individual donations, with additional income from investments and the Wikimedia Enterprise commercial API service."

(Unless this was satire and I missed it)

Re: Wikipedia was in read-only mode following mass admin account compromise

#8
post #4

Woah this looks like an old school XSS worm https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?hidebo... I’ve always thought the fact that MediaWiki sometimes lets editors embed JavaScript could be dangerous.

Also, I’m also surprised an XSS attack like hasn’t yet been actually used to harvest credentials like passwords through browser autofill[0].

It seems like the worm code/the replicated code only really attacks stuff on site. But leaking credentials (and obviously people reuse passwords across sites) could be sooo much worse.

[0] https://varun.ch/posts/autofill/

Post reply on HN