Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
1–10 of 166 posts
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#2This actually has me just as concerned as rising temperatures. And its a pretty hard thing to argue against, no matter your politics. Elon even brought it up when he did that interview with Trump in late 2024 to convince him that we should still care about CO2 levels in the atmosphere, even if you think the threat of a changing climate is overblown. Trump really had no response.
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#3"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created
a lot of value for shareholders.“
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#4"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.“
Clean tech will save the day (low carbon generation, batteries, electrification trajectories and rate of change, broadly speaking), but the global fossil industry will need to be dismantled faster than some will like. It is a matter of survival, not politics or economics. My hunch is there are not many globally who want to suffocate while trying to exist for shareholder value.
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#5Higher carbon dioxide makes us dumber: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229519/
I wonder how long before in-home CO2 extraction becomes a thing.
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#6Plants grow faster (but not better) with more Co2 I wonder if this could be related to global obesity ?
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#7"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.“
And parking is abundant!
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#8"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.“
Clean tech will save the day (low carbon generation, batteries, electrification trajectories and rate of change, broadly speaking), but the global fossil industry will need to be dismantled faster than some will like. It is a matter of survival, not politics or economics. My hunch is there are not many globally who want to suffocate while trying to exist for shareholder value.
> My hunch is there are not many who want to suffocate while trying to exist for shareholder value.
Have you... read the news lately? You say it's not a matter of politics, but the politicians are absolutely trying to roll back the clock, push dirty tech, eliminate all environmental protections and regulations.
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#9"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.“
Clean tech will save the day (low carbon generation, batteries, electrification trajectories and rate of change, broadly speaking), but the global fossil industry will need to be dismantled faster than some will like. It is a matter of survival, not politics or economics. My hunch is there are not many globally who want to suffocate while trying to exist for shareholder value.
Where can I find some of that optimism in 2026?
Re: Rising carbon dioxide levels now detected in human blood
#10"Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.“
Clean tech will save the day (low carbon generation, batteries, electrification trajectories and rate of change, broadly speaking), but the global fossil industry will need to be dismantled faster than some will like. It is a matter of survival, not politics or economics. My hunch is there are not many globally who want to suffocate while trying to exist for shareholder value.
that very much is a matter of politics, people should stop being afraid to acknowledge it
real politics are often concerned with survival